Navigation Section
Business Case — Project PASS PMP
1. Executive Summary
Project PASS PMP is both a professional study platform and a live project execution lab for the team preparing for the PMP® exam.
It consolidates all exam-aligned content into a Single Source of Truth (SoT) website and operates as a working case study where the team applies every PMI process group and ECO task in real time.
This project delivers two outcomes:
- A collaboratively developed, end-to-end Project Management Plan, built through live execution rather than simulation.
- A fully functional PMP knowledge base published via Obsidian → Quartz → GitHub Pages.
2. Problem Statement
- The Simplilearn course has ended; the team now needs a practical capstone to reinforce ECO-based project management through hands-on practice.
- Traditional mock plans don’t give real exposure to integrated tools, communication flow, or change control.
- Members live in different time zones and need a light-touch collaboration model that allows full participation with minimal synchronous meetings.
3. Proposed Solution
Launch Project PASS PMP as a global, asynchronous project lab that:
- Follows the PMI ECO doctrine, particularly 3.2 “Evaluate and deliver project benefits and value.”
- Executes every process step from initiation to closure, producing all subsidiary plans and logs.
- Uses a unified communications ecosystem governed by a PACE plan (Primary–Alternate–Contingency–Emergency) so that every team member knows where and how to communicate.
- Stores all artifacts in a shared GitHub repository, providing:
- Always-on global access to project data.
- Seamless upload of deliverables without gatekeeping.
- Full version control and change-tracking for audit integrity.
- Publishes the finished site as an open, navigable PMP study reference.
4. Strategic Alignment
- Educational: Reinforces Domains 1–3 through direct ECO application.
- Organizational: Demonstrates disciplined virtual collaboration and configuration management.
- Technological: Uses open-source platforms to model professional remote-team operations.
- Value Delivery: Fulfills the ECO mandate to evaluate and deliver project benefits and value by producing a real, public deliverable.
5. Implementation Model
- Cadence: Team-defined, proposed Saturday-to-Saturday sprint cycle.
- Meetings: 1–2 hours weekly for sprint review/retrospective; all other work completed asynchronously.
- Governance: Strict adherence to PMI process-group logic; no deviations without change-request approval.
- Technology Plan:
- Primary (PACE – Primary): GitHub repository and Issues board for deliverable tracking.
- Alternate: Shared messaging platform (e.g., Pumble or Slack) for quick coordination.
- Contingency: Email thread for notifications or when chat platforms are unavailable.
- Emergency: Direct phone or text contact list for time-critical issues.
- This framework ensures communication remains continuous even if a tool fails.
6. Expected Benefits
| Category | Benefit | Measure of Success |
|---|---|---|
| Applied Learning | End-to-end execution of all PMBOK 6/7 and ECO processes | Each member authors ≥1 plan component |
| Unified Communication | Clear, predictable collaboration channels (PACE) | 100 % adherence to the communication plan |
| Global Access | GitHub central repository with version control | Zero lost or conflicting file versions |
| Knowledge Retention | Reinforced through practice, not lecture | Improved mock-exam performance |
| Portfolio Value | Public knowledge base demonstrating PMI discipline | Live site published and maintained |
| Efficiency | Minimal meetings, asynchronous workflow | ≤ 2 hours group time per week |
7. Cost–Benefit Overview
| Resource | Type | Cost Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obsidian + Quartz + GitHub | Platform | $0 | Open-source stack |
| Team member effort | Labor | ~2 hrs meeting + individual sprint work | Low overhead |
| Sponsor / PM | Time | 5–10 hrs weekly | Oversight + QA |
| ROI | Benefit | Certification readiness + permanent asset | Tangible deliverable + knowledge gain |
8. Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule drift | Moderate | Lock sprint goals; track via GitHub Issues |
| Uneven participation | High | Assign artifact ownership; rotate roles |
| Tool failure or access gap | Low | Follow PACE plan hierarchy |
| Scope expansion | Moderate | Change-request control |
| Burnout / overload | Low | Short meetings; async flexibility |
9. Success Metrics
- Fully published, navigable PMP knowledge base on GitHub Pages.
- Completed, validated Project Management Plan with all subsidiary documents.
- Functioning PACE communication plan adopted by all members.
- Demonstrated proficiency in PMI process groups and ECO tasks.
- Documented Lessons Learned log at closure.
10. Recommendation
Approve Project PASS PMP as both a knowledge-base build and a live ECO-aligned project-management lab.
The unified communications and technology plan ensures seamless global collaboration, while the live execution format transforms study into applied experience—reinforcing every skill required for PMP certification and producing a professional artifact of enduring value.
Prepared by:
John Barkle — Sponsor / Project Manager
Date: 2025-10-17
Section Contents
- Business Case - Project Pass PMP
- Project Charter — Project PASS PMP
- Project Management Plan — Project PASS PMP
- Change Management Plan
- Change Request Template
- Configuration Management Plan
- Performance Measurement Baseline
- Project Lifecycle Description
- Development Approach Document
- Project Integration Management – Document Index